Michael,
> Until 'xcopy' failed with "insufficient memory" errors on a large copy
> job, I was unaware of a utility from the Win2k3 reskit called 'robocopy';
> it is a great replacement for xcopy, has features to do incremental
> and differential backups to block oriented media, and also can run as
> a service.
XXCopy is also a good xcopy replacement.
> The copy job can be setup using UNC names for sources and
> destinations so drive mappings aren't needed. Since it can run as a
> service, perhaps it could work without a user logged in to the workstation
> (haven't tried but it seems reasonable)?
How reasonable & secure is it to have a service able to copy anything
from a server?
Even with the copy utility running as a service, there needs to be an
authenticated session to the server to be able to read files from it.
H.